Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Sloppy Joe View Post

Never said it, but as the owner of an anti-fraud site, being complicit in a fraudulent death hoax was and is disastrous for your brand.

Is everything about the Lurker/Cathy's romance completely made up?
Almost everything Lurker said was false or mostly false. The only thing true was that he did move around a lot to different states, but I supposed he didn't lie about that because he knew I could see his general location from his IP.

I wasn't "complicit" in anything. I've explained it all before, and won't bother explaining it again. You can go back to those old threads if you want to see the whole story. Part of that story was the fact that, by coincidence, I was experiencing a horrendous mental health event at the time cmoney did that, and it was the last thing I was in the mood to deal with. I'm not your daddy or guardian, and you can get along without me if I'm taking a short break from the forum because of health reasons.

"My brand" was not harmed by this, because the only people who gave a shit about cmoney are longtime NWP community members, and that crowd isn't really here to talk about poker/gambling frauds.

I haven't seen a single instance of someone who was otherwise going to bring a fraud story to PFA, but said, "Hey wait, didn't that cmoney guy fake his death there? Better post it on two plus two."
So much for personal accountability. Surely you could have mustered up a simple 'this is fake' post given your awareness of it.

Why were you contrite at the time if you did nothing wrong?

Not saying it destroys your brand, but a huge blemish no doubt. Its for really for you to judge, just facts.

No bigger hoax than death.