Originally Posted by
Deal
i have proof from AP/UB that they generated an array of decks (randomized) and then used them in order from deck 1 to X and then repeated. They did it that way to save computing resources. They way I found out was when they introduced Blackjack they set X to 100 and a friends grandma noticed some repeating hands while playing the fun money games. We then played for a couple days tracking and recording decks and took them for 10's of thousands. We would sit at a new table therefore getting a new deck. Play a hand for min bet, if it matched one of the decks we recorded we would up the bet to max and pound the house. This went undetected for about 3 weeks. After it was fixed I talked to the operations manager about it and he told me the details. The hilarious part was that his fix was to change X to 100000. He confirmed the poker routine was the same. I suspect there were people playing HU poker that figure it out. I don't know for sure.
I withdrew maximum every week from AP for 3 months but couldn't get it all off before shutdown. However, as you know, the DOJ arranged for players to finally get paid. I just cashed my AP cheque a week ago. The one Druff gave a 0.0 percent chance would ever come at least a dozen times on these forums and in Radio. It was well worth the wait.
Cliffs: AP/UB was coded by idiots. No doubt exploits exist in other gambling software. By nature that field attracts degens of all stripes.
Reply With Quote