Article Nato 5 discussion only began under Biden. Ukraine? Afghanistan withdraw? Hamas/Israel. Border? China? Yemen.
Tine none of this shit happened under Trump. I get inflation, economy, etc.. are issues outside of any President. It's an economic cycle. But the above I just listed never would have happened under Trump simply out of fear he would have launched a nuke. It was like when Jimmy Carter had all the hostages taken by Iran? Remember that. The day Reagan was elected they were released.
The Dems elected a a senile old man and a progressive nut as VP. You cannot deny that. I see no possibility Biden wins in 2024, Trump or otherwise.
PokerFraudAlert...will never censor your claims, even if they're against one of our sponsors. In addition to providing you an open forum report fraud within the poker community, we will also analyze your claims with a clear head an unbiased point of view. And, of course, the accused will always have the floor to defend themselves.-Dan Druff
Brothers you have to admit it is funny that Trump is in trouble for saying they rig elections but then they literally conspired to have him thrown off the ballot in a major state
the af withdraw was a deal trump brokered, but the hamas/israel shit is legit disgraceful.
the surest way to get biden elected in 2024 is to put trump as the other option. bidens a fool but the system has ways of dealing with senility. trump is stone crazy and half retarded, at least. people view biden with open disdain and resentment but also view trump with undisguised fear. pretty much same story as 2020 iirc but we are much sicker of biden, im not sure if that actually changes anything tho.
if we somehow get a newsom/haley ballot the S&P will limit up for a month straight.
any ticket with biden on it is a failure of the democratic party at absolute face value and presents clear evidence of a rot that needs to be torn out at the roots.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
Afghanistan debacle under Biden happened on his watch, brokered deal by the other guy blah blah blah. Biden could have changed this deal you talked about it, fact remains he had no idea about it because he has dementia.
Getting back to the issue, the CO Supreme Court shit the fucking bed. Even you will admit this played into Trumps playbook. Anecdotal I know, but I have read like 5 articles the Biden crew is furious with these 4 CO justices. Their whole theme was 'Trump is against Democracy' then some Ivy Leaguers 2000 miles away from where they graduated take him off the ballot.
It's almost unexplainable. The far left calls the shots in the Democratic Party and that is the way it is. Trump gained another +2 on this one. Just need one more indictment from say Boston and he gets up by 10 points nationally.
Tine is head liberal faggot. What an accomplishment you moron.
Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.
Ronald Reagan
His last post wasn’t that bad
I’m a huge Nicky haily supporter
It’s one of those weird things where literally nobody believes it was an “insurrection” but a lot of people pretend they believe it, mainly as a way to get people they don’t like into trouble
This is an effective strategy that works well in all aspects of life
It didn't take much research to see it's going to be a no brainer for SCOTUS to overturn the unlawful decision by the Colorado Supreme Court. They used Section 3 of the 14th amendment to kick Trump off the ballot. Here it is:
"Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."
There's a Catch-22 here. And that is the oath taken by members of Congress to "support" the constitution. The Presidential Oath is different:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
"Preserve, protect and defend" is different from "support." But that is not what SCOTUS will focus on. They will focus on Section 5 which states:
"Section 5 Enforcement; The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."
Nowhere is Section 5 did Congress give state courts any authority. And they had a damn good reason not to give those state courts any authority. They wrote Section 3 to prevent anyone who served in the Confederacy from serving in Congress.
If they gave any authority to the states do you think Virginia courts would have disqualified Robert E. Lee had he chose to run for Congress? Or how about Jefferson Davis? Do you think Mississippi courts would have prevented Davis from running for President?
Congress kept those decisions to themselves because they knew that giving the states any rights would defeat the entire purpose. So the Colorado Court is not just exceeding it's authority. They have no authority at all. What they did is unlawful.
SCOTUS is going to shoot the Colorado Court down in a New York minute--based on Section 5.. You heard it here first.
POKER FAG ALERT! FOR BLOW JOBS SEE SLOPPY JOE, SONATINE AND BCR.
Come on brother that’s the second time I got you worked up with that joke
PokerFraudAlert...will never censor your claims, even if they're against one of our sponsors. In addition to providing you an open forum report fraud within the poker community, we will also analyze your claims with a clear head an unbiased point of view. And, of course, the accused will always have the floor to defend themselves.-Dan Druff
low hanging fruit pal
you know I can’t stand that scripted, war monger, establishment rino bitch
everything about her is disingenuous…she’s a complete fraud
naturally she has been propped up by the deep state MSM it makes me sick to watch because her entire campaign is a total sham
Nicky Haley is bought and paid for by the military-industrial complex. Vote for her if you like funding and fighting wars.
POKER FAG ALERT! FOR BLOW JOBS SEE SLOPPY JOE, SONATINE AND BCR.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)