I do believe that Robbi's lawsuit threats are nonsense, and one will never occur.

This is because both players are considered limited purpose public figures in poker, as they chose to voluntarily appear on a high stakes poker stream.

Therefore, the threshold to prove defamation requires "actual malice" -- which is defined as saying something untrue which you KNOW is untrue.

It is pretty clear that Garrett THINKS he was cheated, so there's no way to show actual malice here.

Case is dead in the water. Robbi's lawyer husband knows this.

At the same time, LOL @ Garrett pretending he is holding back some bombshell which will prove him right. There's nothing he can do at this point, and it's clear that he already shot his load.