Quote Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
The strongest case is the one involving election subversion and Georgia. Does it rise to the level of criminal activity to where this should interfere with a Presidential election? I don't believe so. I think Trump legitimately thought he was cheated, and was trying to get Georgia officials to act on that belief. Obviously idiotic for him to do, but again, criminally charging him during a Presidential election is something which shouldn't be done lightly.

These charges exist for one purpose and one purpose only -- to deny Trump the 2024 Presidency. It's a form of election interference.
There's no way this trial goes off before the election. Only the defendants have a right to a speedy trial, not the prosecution. The defendants have a right to thoroughly go over all documents pertaining to the case. There's 19 defendents. Thousands of documents so a fair trial can't be done so quickly.
wrong again

the "people" have a right to a speedy trial as well as the defendant


There is not 19 its down to 15

so much wrong in one post

mb tucker is just gaslighting you assholes as he does so well



by time it gets to trial it will be rudy trump eastman and clark and mb meadows