are erika kirk and jd vance fucking?

[sonatine]

I did find Erika's post-shooting behavior to be a bit bizarre, but I chalked it up to her putting on a brave face so she could continue Charlie's movement. I thought, "Yeah, she doesn't seem as broken up about this as I'd expect, but she realizes that this is a huge moment for TPUSA, so she can't just go into hiding and let it wither away. Charlie would have wanted it this way."

But now I don't know what to say. Some of these criticisms are valid. Why wear leather pants like that at all? She shouldn't want to look sexy in any way at this point. She's supposed to have the role of "good Christian widow in mourning over the recent murder of her husband". When she dresses for events, she should never go for "hot" -- at least not until a reasonable amount of time has passed since Charlie's death.

The hug is less of a big deal to me. Some women are just clueless regarding how being overly touchy can give off the wrong signals. In fact, about 25 years ago, I had to have a talk with a female friend whom I witnessed being too touchy with some of her male friends. I saw her do it to a dude whom I knew 100% she had zero interest, and I told her she probably shouldn't touch the guy the way she did, or he'd get the wrong idea. Her answer to me was, "Oh, trust me... I see him like a brother. He knows that." I replied, "You see him like a brother, but are you sure he sees you like a sister? Because from what I can see, he's into you, and the way you touch him is giving him the wrong idea." She told me I was crazy, but a week later she called me in a panic telling me that I was right, and that he had just professed his love to her. "I had no idea that I was doing this... I touch everyone like this, even my girlfriends. I feel like such a dumbass", she said.

Anyway, Erika might have just hugged JD like this because she saw him as a platonic substitute for Charlie -- a male in her life who seemed to provide her comfort. It was obviously subconscious, because there's no way she's putting her hand in his hair like that during a public hug if she knows that it will get people talking.



Orrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.......

There is something to all of this, and it just hasn't fully developed yet.

Vance is probably feeling the pressure regarding having a Hindi wife. Many are making it about race, but I don't think it's that. Vance isn't so much worried about satisfying the white supremacists. They're not very large in number, even if they're loud. Interracial relationships are no big deal anymore, except to racial purists. The problem is the religion thing. He sees it as a liability in the 2028 primary if he is Catholic and his wife isn't any form of Christian. That might make it tough to win the Christian vote. The religious right voters will ask themselves how important Vance's faith is to him, if he married into a completely different faith.

While white supremacists are not a big portion of the GOP, religious Christians are. He needs them to win the primary.

So, yes, this might be the beginning of the end for him and Usha, as he's setting the stage for why they have to part (religious incompatibility). Whether he moves on to Erika Kirk at that point is in question. If it looks like something already in the works before Charlie's body was cold, it could backfire badly.

we can also talk about her wearing superbowl rings, thats also completely in scope.

[mickeycrimm]

Are sonatine and tellesnitch fucking?

there you go again, back to hurling pedo and/or gay accusations.



i got curious, so i asked chat gpt the following verbatim:



Q: is there a psychological defect with someone who routinely hurls slurs online accusing others of being either pedos or gay?



it's verbatim response with emphasis supplied is, well, perfect for you. enjoy:


A: There isn’t a single diagnostic label that cleanly fits that behavior, but the pattern is not random. When someone habitually throws around *pedo* or *gay* as insults, especially in online settings, they’re typically running a very old psychological defensive playbook. It’s not about the target. It’s about the speaker trying to manage something inside themselves.

Here’s what’s usually going on under the hood:

They’re using the nuclear insults because they lack better tools.
If a person has weak emotional regulation or poor verbal problem-solving, they don’t argue logic or evidence. They reach for the loudest accusation they can find. It’s the psychological equivalent of a toddler throwing a plate because they don’t have the words to say they’re frustrated.

There’s projection involved.
Accusing others of deviance or “wrongness” is often a way of distracting attention from their own insecurities, impulses, or shame. Classic projection: *If I say it about you loudly enough, no one will look at me.*

There’s a need to control the narrative.
Calling someone a pedophile or using “gay” as a slur instantly tries to socially destroy them. It’s a dominance move. People who feel powerless or small often try to control others by inflicting reputational damage. It’s a band-aid for low self-worth.

And sometimes it’s unresolved identity confusion or fear.

Particularly when “gay” is the go-to insult: it often signals discomfort with their own sexual identity, or with intimacy itself. That doesn’t mean they’re secretly gay. It means they learned early on that expressing vulnerability = danger, so they mock what they fear in themselves.

Is it a *clinical disorder*? Not usually.

It’s more like a mix of:

• Underdeveloped emotional maturity
• Low frustration tolerance
• Shame-based identity
• Learned bullying as self-defense

Plenty of people have those traits without meeting psychiatric criteria.

If you want the simplest summary:

This is what someone does when they have no real power, so they use humiliation as a substitute for it.

When someone is settled, confident, and has an identity not held together with duct tape and ego-spackle, they simply don’t need to behave like that. It feels beneath them, because it *is*.

This kind of person burns through relationships, credibility, and eventually self-respect. They’re usually lonely in the long run, and that loneliness is what they’re trying so hard not to feel.

One of the strange truths of human psychology:
The louder the insult, the quieter the self-esteem.

If you want to go deeper, we can explore how to neutralize or dismantle that behavior in real time—either socially, legally, or psychologically.

sonatine and bcr have repeately called others pedo's on this forum for years. That's where we learned it from. So your hard work in indicting them is much appreciated even though your interest is salacious

PS God your stupid

[Texter]

This rumor is just like the rumor that Webb Hubbell is Chelsea Clinton’s real father. Can’t prove it…but won’t be stunned if proven.

[Tellafriend]

PS God your stupid

you're*

[mickeycrimm]

PS God your stupid

you're*

You are down to pointing out typos? Are you and David USF fucking?

PS God you’re stupid.

[RichardBrodiesCombover.]

there you go again, back to hurling pedo and/or gay accusations.



i got curious, so i asked chat gpt the following verbatim:



Q: is there a psychological defect with someone who routinely hurls slurs online accusing others of being either pedos or gay?



it's verbatim response with emphasis supplied is, well, perfect for you. enjoy:


A: There isn’t a single diagnostic label that cleanly fits that behavior, but the pattern is not random. When someone habitually throws around *pedo* or *gay* as insults, especially in online settings, they’re typically running a very old psychological defensive playbook. It’s not about the target. It’s about the speaker trying to manage something inside themselves.

Here’s what’s usually going on under the hood:

They’re using the nuclear insults because they lack better tools.
If a person has weak emotional regulation or poor verbal problem-solving, they don’t argue logic or evidence. They reach for the loudest accusation they can find. It’s the psychological equivalent of a toddler throwing a plate because they don’t have the words to say they’re frustrated.

There’s projection involved.
Accusing others of deviance or “wrongness” is often a way of distracting attention from their own insecurities, impulses, or shame. Classic projection: *If I say it about you loudly enough, no one will look at me.*

There’s a need to control the narrative.
Calling someone a pedophile or using “gay” as a slur instantly tries to socially destroy them. It’s a dominance move. People who feel powerless or small often try to control others by inflicting reputational damage. It’s a band-aid for low self-worth.

And sometimes it’s unresolved identity confusion or fear.

Particularly when “gay” is the go-to insult: it often signals discomfort with their own sexual identity, or with intimacy itself. That doesn’t mean they’re secretly gay. It means they learned early on that expressing vulnerability = danger, so they mock what they fear in themselves.

Is it a *clinical disorder*? Not usually.

It’s more like a mix of:

• Underdeveloped emotional maturity
• Low frustration tolerance
• Shame-based identity
• Learned bullying as self-defense

Plenty of people have those traits without meeting psychiatric criteria.

If you want the simplest summary:

This is what someone does when they have no real power, so they use humiliation as a substitute for it.

When someone is settled, confident, and has an identity not held together with duct tape and ego-spackle, they simply don’t need to behave like that. It feels beneath them, because it *is*.

This kind of person burns through relationships, credibility, and eventually self-respect. They’re usually lonely in the long run, and that loneliness is what they’re trying so hard not to feel.

One of the strange truths of human psychology:
The louder the insult, the quieter the self-esteem.

If you want to go deeper, we can explore how to neutralize or dismantle that behavior in real time—either socially, legally, or psychologically.

sonatine and bcr have repeately called others pedo's on this forum for years. That's where we learned it from. So your hard work in indicting them is much appreciated even though your interest is salacious

PS God your stupid

"repeately"

[Jayjami]

you're*

You are down to pointing out typos? Are you and David USF fucking?

PS God you’re stupid.

Why are you always fantasizing about other men on this board having sex with each other? It's kinda weird.

[BCR]

Mickey is so embarrassingly senile at this point.

I don’t recall anyone in 20 years calling someone a pedo other than an occasional joke until desert started his reign of shitposting and calling Walter a pedo a thousand times while at the same time clearly not even understanding what the word meant. I don’t think he still understands what it means.

Druff would ask him why he’s accusing some guy of being a pedophile who has never did or said anything even remotely weird like that. His idiotic response would be that Walter was following him around an Internet forum and remarking on his idiocy.

How following around some pudgy Arab who was almost 50 years old at the time and making fun of him=pedophile, no one still understands. He has never made a single ounce of sense in his explanations.

I mark that as the beginning of the end. Ground zero where it went from a forum that could be rough, but still fun. Not dealing with desert just encouraged more of the dumbest white people alive to start posting and it’s been downhill ever since.

Anyone calling anyone a pedo since then is parody aimed at mocking desert

[sonatine]

that said

[BCR]

I tell you what would really set the social media world on fire would be is if we find out not only is JD banging the wife, but that he was already banging the wife BEFORE he was killed.

Imagine the fun the conspiracy theorists would have with that one. That JD fell in love and his financial backers hired some mercenaries to have Charlie killed to protect the secret and his future presidency and that’s why Kash Patel and others have squashed the investigation. Why she didn’t appear sad and has acted so erratically and why JD all of a sudden is having problems with his Hindu wife’s failure to drink the Jesus juice.


I don’t believe that of course, but I expect that angle to start popping up on the conspiracy circuit.

[sonatine]

hey guys i was on this 9th tier poker forum and someone said they may have heard that vance was fucking erika _before_ whats his face, the husband got shot.

im not saying its true, im just saying its something i definitely just read and in the interests of providing fair and balanced coverage of this sordid situation im going to also tell everyone who will listen about it on twitter.

[Tellafriend]

for posterity's sake:

Are sonatine and tellesnitch fucking?

there you go again, back to hurling pedo and/or gay accusations.



i got curious, so i asked chat gpt the following verbatim:



Q: is there a psychological defect with someone who routinely hurls slurs online accusing others of being either pedos or gay?



it's verbatim response with emphasis supplied is, well, perfect for you. enjoy:


A: There isn’t a single diagnostic label that cleanly fits that behavior, but the pattern is not random. When someone habitually throws around *pedo* or *gay* as insults, especially in online settings, they’re typically running a very old psychological defensive playbook. It’s not about the target. It’s about the speaker trying to manage something inside themselves.

Here’s what’s usually going on under the hood:

They’re using the nuclear insults because they lack better tools.
If a person has weak emotional regulation or poor verbal problem-solving, they don’t argue logic or evidence. They reach for the loudest accusation they can find. It’s the psychological equivalent of a toddler throwing a plate because they don’t have the words to say they’re frustrated.

There’s projection involved.
Accusing others of deviance or “wrongness” is often a way of distracting attention from their own insecurities, impulses, or shame. Classic projection: *If I say it about you loudly enough, no one will look at me.*

There’s a need to control the narrative.
Calling someone a pedophile or using “gay” as a slur instantly tries to socially destroy them. It’s a dominance move. People who feel powerless or small often try to control others by inflicting reputational damage. It’s a band-aid for low self-worth.

And sometimes it’s unresolved identity confusion or fear.

Particularly when “gay” is the go-to insult: it often signals discomfort with their own sexual identity, or with intimacy itself. That doesn’t mean they’re secretly gay. It means they learned early on that expressing vulnerability = danger, so they mock what they fear in themselves.

Is it a *clinical disorder*? Not usually.

It’s more like a mix of:

• Underdeveloped emotional maturity
• Low frustration tolerance
• Shame-based identity
• Learned bullying as self-defense

Plenty of people have those traits without meeting psychiatric criteria.

If you want the simplest summary:

This is what someone does when they have no real power, so they use humiliation as a substitute for it.

When someone is settled, confident, and has an identity not held together with duct tape and ego-spackle, they simply don’t need to behave like that. It feels beneath them, because it *is*.

This kind of person burns through relationships, credibility, and eventually self-respect. They’re usually lonely in the long run, and that loneliness is what they’re trying so hard not to feel.

One of the strange truths of human psychology:
The louder the insult, the quieter the self-esteem.

If you want to go deeper, we can explore how to neutralize or dismantle that behavior in real time—either socially, legally, or psychologically.

[mickeycrimm]

You are down to pointing out typos? Are you and David USF fucking?

PS God you’re stupid.

Why are you always fantasizing about other men on this board having sex with each other? It's kinda weird.

You shouldn't cast aspersions when you and your leftard friends are willing participants in a thread started by sonatine about J.D. Vance's sex life. What is your fascination with Vance's sex life?

[The Icon]

you're*

You are down to pointing out typos? Are you and David USF fucking?

PS God you’re stupid.

It’s not a typo. It’s blatant stupidity. And this isn’t the only time you’ve misused you are and you’re. I’d bet $500 I could find 25 or more instances in less than 24 hours.

[mickeycrimm]

You are down to pointing out typos? Are you and David USF fucking?

PS God you’re stupid.

It’s not a typo. It’s blatant stupidity. And this isn’t the only time you’ve misused you are and you’re. I’d bet $500 I could find 25 or more instances in less than 24 hours.

And I bet you $500 I can find 25 or more instances where I used "you're" and "your" correctly, idiot. So let's get it on. Challenge accepted.

[Sheesfaced]

Why are you always fantasizing about other men on this board having sex with each other? It's kinda weird.

You shouldn't cast aspersions when you and your leftard friends are willing participants in a thread started by sonatine about J.D. Vance's sex life. What is your fascination with Vance's sex life?

Or in your case casting “aspergersions”

[mickeycrimm]

You shouldn't cast aspersions when you and your leftard friends are willing participants in a thread started by sonatine about J.D. Vance's sex life. What is your fascination with Vance's sex life?

Or in your case casting “aspergersions”

Or in your case, casting the shit off your nose, shitface.

[The Icon]

It’s not a typo. It’s blatant stupidity. And this isn’t the only time you’ve misused you are and you’re. I’d bet $500 I could find 25 or more instances in less than 24 hours.

And I bet you $500 I can find 25 or more instances where I used "you're" and "your" correctly, idiot. So let's get it on. Challenge accepted.

I’m gonna need you to escrow with Druff and agree to 3 impartial arbitrators ahead of time

[desertrunner]

This thread shows how retarded Spnatine is and how desperate the left is. Her husband was just murdered and she is on stage trying to get through this mental break down stage of her life and she reaches up and hugs the VP a certain way and you lose your mind??

I really dont care what political side your on, this is a NOTHING THING...a simple hug. Atleast to me it is, I guess the left side is super desperate now.

[Jayjami]

Why are you always fantasizing about other men on this board having sex with each other? It's kinda weird.

You shouldn't cast aspersions when you and your leftard friends are willing participants in a thread started by sonatine about J.D. Vance's sex life. What is your fascination with Vance's sex life?

I don't give a shit about Vance. I only noted that it's obvious to everyone that your are repressing your homosexuality. Trying to make you more self aware. You're welcome.