Originally Posted by
Brittney Griner's Clit
I hate that I have to make it look like I'm sticking up for this miserable piece of shit that knows so much about my childhood but can someone spell it out for me why all you people did a 180 on her? Shirley it's not over 53 dollars. Shirley it's not because she has been arrested before. Make it make sense please. From here this looks like the biggest case of "Who the fuck would ever care" of all time.
There isn't a mass turning on her, as several people have come forward to say that they don't feel her personal info should be out here.
This isn't about $53. As I said, $50 of it was her own donation which never got used, so that's not a huge deal to let her take back.
This is about the community being nervous when a fairly new and active user has recent fraud arrests, and how people need to know this before something bad potentially happens. Because she's female and seems to be intelligent, the potential is much higher for her to build close personal relationships with members here, who will get to like and trust her. It's important that these people are not left in the dark regarding her recent past.
Had these arrests occurred 20 years ago with nothing like that since, I would dismiss it as youthful indiscretions and this would all be a non-story.
That's not to say that everyone on PFA needs a clean record, or that someone who got in trouble with the law recently isn't welcome here.
It's just that when I recognize that a member has a high potential to be liked and trusted by many, and then I find they are recently getting arrested multiple times for fraud-type crimes, it's something that needs to come to light.
FYI, there is NO EVIDENCE that there was any kind of long con involved, or that she was planning to roll anyone. It's very possible that these arrests are completely separate to her PFA life, and that she just wanted to be liked/accepted here, with no bad intentions. But we couldn't take that chance with keeping it quiet.
Reply With Quote