all of this stuff is provable.
Printable View
LMAO SO MUCH FOR A FREE SPEECH SITE
First off, I am very skeptical that Republicans are "pedophiles" any more than Democrats are. I don't think the way you use "pedophile" is very accurate or useful, but even given your working definition I would surmise that older men are obviously the demographic most likely to be involved, and Republicans have more older men than Democrats, and once you control for this variable, I doubt there is any discernible difference.
Second, having access to sexual relations with much younger women and men (mostly but not always post pubescent) has been a perk of being an authority figure since pretty much the beginning of human civilization (and probably much earlier than this). And this was completely normal and socially acceptable until the last couple decades, and is still completely normal and acceptable in most of the world outside the US. This whole partisan gotcha game seems very disingenuous and dishonest IMO.
4D was pretty damn conservative, just sayin’.
Kent Stermon, the political donor behind Ron DeSantis's rapid rise to prominence, took his own life after he was accused of having an inappropriate relationship with an underaged teen.
huh!
Aww look at Sonny fats trying
At this late hour on the Lord's day fats love the heart
Can I have a moment for tine as he trundles to the kitchen
Satan is working hard everywhere, he will appear to win, then…….
Sonaphile, what's your take on transgender drag queens performing in front of kids? You know, the groomers?
Also, do you agree with democratic party support for pornographic books in grade schools, which the Clinton's just came out in support of?
It's easy enough to just look up; they gave you his name:
https://www.usatoday.com/elections/r...nate-PA-39078/
Republican, not that it matters. I don't presume that any political party is immune to having pedos in it. Are we keeping score to determine the least of two evils?
I guess that's how most people vote, so why not?