Hills up by 6, apparently Donald is doing himself no favors by inviting her husbands lover to attend the debates.
That said, who the fuck knows what happens on Monday...
Printable View
Hills up by 6, apparently Donald is doing himself no favors by inviting her husbands lover to attend the debates.
That said, who the fuck knows what happens on Monday...
I've shipped the whole $3k Druff can confirm.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
why do u keep harassing me? u said it was ok if I waited till druff had ur 3k which he has not come close to confirming
I found this on 2p2. A must watch imo.
AHH the good old days.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFZ-1EojoFM
There is a PM function. Try it.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkongerI've shipped the whole $3k Druff can confirm.Quote:
Originally Posted by thesidedish
Shut it down you fucking wine headQuote:
Originally Posted by DraymondThere is a PM function. Try it.Quote:
Originally Posted by hongkonger
If Trump can get all "dem bitches" to come along it'd be well worth it.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Quote:
Originally Posted by big dick
I hate this video because it takes Trump way out of context.
He says enough actual outrageous things that it shouldn't be necessary to make misleading videos which intentionally change the meaning of what he was saying.
Shit like this is why so many people are getting distrustful of the left.
Both sides do it and it is disgusting.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan DruffQuote:
Originally Posted by big dick
I hate this video because it takes Trump way out of context.
He says enough actual outrageous things that it shouldn't be necessary to make misleading videos which intentionally change the meaning of what he was saying.
Shit like this is why so many people are getting distrustful of the left.
Not one person will watch that and not know the meaning, where on the Right, over half his supporters "were" questioning if Obama was even born here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan DruffQuote:
Originally Posted by big dick
I hate this video because it takes Trump way out of context.
He says enough actual outrageous things that it shouldn't be necessary to make misleading videos which intentionally change the meaning of what he was saying.
Shit like this is why so many people are getting distrustful of the left.
Comparing the RW conspiracy theories w/the "distrustful" left is absurd.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wo...-a7325716.html
really interesting interview with allan lichtman, the guy who put together a key based prediction system to determine the presidential election outcomes since 1984.
the media, of course, is fixating on his key results, which predict trump, but when you actually ask allan to explain it, he points out that his own system likely doesnt even apply to this election because trump is in literal terms the least emotionally stable, intelligent, grounded 'candidate' in the history of our democracy, by a previously inconceivable margin.
Trump is headed for a win, says professor who has predicted 30 years of presidential outcomes correctly
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/.../?tid=pm_pop_b
Quote:
Lichtman's prediction isn't based on horse-race polls, shifting demographics or his own political opinions. Rather, he uses a system of true/false statements he calls the "Keys to the White House" to determine his predicted winner.
And this year, he says, Donald Trump is the favorite to win.
http://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/att...1&d=1462458388
Not blaming you but always find these headlines from media ridiculous. 30 years he's been correct. But wait that's 8 elections. And half of those weren't even close which makes it about 4/4 correct. And even then you have Bush/Gore which was pretty much a tie... So he is what like 3/3? It's like those dogs that predict superbowl wins...Quote:
Originally Posted by TheXFactor
Not saying that the guy doesn't know what he's doing but anyone with a basic knowledge of statistics sees his record means nothing.
I also would bet there are probably 100 000s of people in USA who have correctly predicted the last 8 elections... Hell I would expect millions
so i post an interview where lichtman effectively invalidates his own predictive model and you two want to sit here and argue about whether or not some media clickbait about lichtman's predictive model is accurate?
thats some prime pfa right there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
More pepe less lichtman
Missouri gave its EVs to the winner of every election for about 12 elections in a row or something like that and the pundits all said whichever way Missouri is going that's the way the election is going. Then Missouri didn't vote for Obama and he won anyway. People who don't understand statistics trying to claim any random but coincidental pattern is a trend are retards.Quote:
Originally Posted by sonatine
Just when you thought you couldn't get any worse regarding the email thing: http://observer.com/2016/09/the-fbi-...te-was-a-sham/
If that story is true, it's pretty damning, and I don't mean for Hillary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Dragons
Or you can talk to people who know law and recognize that there was no case worth prosecuting.. But yeah a site that claims "Clinton’s Complete Lack of a Funny Bone Could Cost Her Monday’s Debate" and
"Hillary Clinton is one angry comment away from being the SNL parody of herself" and that all this is hurting her while "shes behind the polls" is certainly one way to find conclusions online otherwise rejected by sane, well adjusted people.
I guess we shouldn't be surprised the conservative movement was taken over by a con man. Their poster boy is also a con man.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/0...payback-228651