Im not the one "babbling"
I meant she copped to it tonight. She didnt squirm her way out of it, or say "That's business!", or that she was "taking advantage of the law". She just took the hit and admitted she fucked up.
But why are you so terribly obsessed with getting more than that from a case where no charges were filed? Why arent you focusing this burning thirst for truth on Trump's lawsuits for racism, history of tax evasion, dozens of lawsuits, and documented rape charges?
That's where I get really and genuinely confused about the motives at bar.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
Sir, respectfully, that ship sailed the second we put those missile defense bases in Poland.
Russia thinks it can 'do business' with Trump, eg get Trump to disavow our NATO commitments in exchange for god knows what. Hillary is not going to let that happen, and its extremely important to our economic ties with Europe that we fly that flag.
Trump would sell out NATO for a fucking tax break on Trump Tower Moscow in the blink of an eye, then tell everyone how many jobs he created while Russian tanks flatten Tblisi.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
You seem to be writing this as if I'm defending Trump.
I just wrote a long essay about all the ways he screwed up in the debate while mostly praising Hillary's performance, so there is no agenda here.
The lack of charges filed against her for the e-mail scandal were more political than anything else. Comey probably didn't want to be the one deciding the Presidential election, and he was also likely under pressure from the DOJ to drop it, as that's a very partisan office.
They had more than enough evidence against her to charge her, and he even outlined this evidence before dropping the bomb that there would be no charges.
Bottom line is that this is very worthy of discussion at a Presidential debate, and more than just "I did it, I shouldn't have, let's move on."
If you are a Trump fan or at least hate Hillary... or even if you love her and want to see the opposing script this is just must watch shit. Five hours of Alex Jones getting in every possible position to take Trump's dick. Thee actual debate starts somewhere in the middle. He basically shit talks Hillary throughout the whole thing in real time while never saying one thing critical of Trump.
I wish I saw how this happened over the last few years. Blows my mind thinking about selling a group of people that have been told for 15 years that the establishment is completely impenetrable for anyone to break into that isn't part of the club that Trump is suddenly the guy that did it.
Yup....and there are MANY examples of low-level dweebs making a simple error with classified info and being sent to MP/fed prison or losing their jobs. When you are a current member of the American oligarchy though.....meh, just brush it under the table. "I DUNT UNDERSTAND THEM TECH-CYBER THINGS DURRR....ELECT ME PRESIDENT!"
Point taken, sorry.
I just wrote a long essay about all the ways he screwed up in the debate while mostly praising Hillary's performance, so there is no agenda here.
The lack of charges filed against her for the e-mail scandal were more political than anything else. Comey probably didn't want to be the one deciding the Presidential election, and he was also likely under pressure from the DOJ to drop it, as that's a very partisan office.
They had more than enough evidence against her to charge her, and he even outlined this evidence before dropping the bomb that there would be no charges.
Bottom line is that this is very worthy of discussion at a Presidential debate, and more than just "I did it, I shouldn't have, let's move on."
The reason why this didnt happen is because Donald knows that every ounce of shade he throws at Hillary over her past failures is going to open the door to his own failures, which outnumber hers something like 50-1 at this point. So if he asks the moderator to stay on topic about email for say, 5 or 10 minutes, we can expect to spend 5 or 10 minutes on things that are considerably worse than her deleting emails or running a private server. Things that the United State government itself took exception with and sanctioned him over. So yeah, thats not a great line for him. Not much end game there.
Oh and also because Hillary has a great team that did an amazing job of showing her how to tilt Simple Donald into becoming a stammering wreck.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
Buck Sexton (who sounds like a cross between a porn star and Mike Sexton) had a very similar take on the debate to mine:
Trump needs stronger showing next time
The conventional wisdom going into the first debate was that Donald Trump would have to tone it down and appear more presidential. Trump definitely took a more staid and steadied approach, but it didn't work. His bravado and charm were largely absent from the stage. Trump the showman can dance around policy pitfalls and distract from some of his less than successful business dealings. Sedate Donald had far fewer tools at his disposal, and looked like he couldn't wait for the 90-minute snooze-fest to end.
Hillary Clinton didn't give a memorable performance, but she didn't have to. Most Americans expect Madame Secretary to drone on, joylessly, about policy, and wave her curriculum vitae like a club against her enemies. She met expectations, which was enough, and during some of the actual policy exchanges clearly had the upper hand on knowledge and background.
Trump had huge areas of vulnerability to exploit in his opponent, and he barely touched her on them -- from Benghazi to her emails to the allegations of Clinton Foundation corruption. He will need a much stronger showing in his next debate or this thing will be over long before November.
Here's a bunch of opinions about the debate from various columnists: http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/27/opinio...dup/index.html
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
Trump debates like a retarded 5th grader, and still 64% of cnbc viewers/readers, think trump won.
But i guess in a "democratic" society, only the pundits opinions count, you know some of the same pundits that dismissed trump from the beginning, saying he would never win a primary let alone the presidency.
Let's all keep valuing the opinions of people that continue to get it wrong. Seems like a good way to go about life.
"Druff would suck his own dick if it were long enough"- Brandon "drexel" Gerson
"ann coulter literally has more common sense than pfa."-Sonatine
"Real grinders supports poker fraud"- Ray Davis
"DRILLED HER GOOD"- HONGKONGER
My only takeaway from it was that he was more concerned about his positioning than anything else. I don't mean positioning about climate change or how to deal with terrorists, but positioning in that he can't be tied to any of the miserable fuckups of any democrat or republican politicians, and therefore vote for the devil you don't know, not the devil you really, really know.
trump hammering her with her 30-years in washington was a super-effective attack during the first 10 minutes of the debate.
then hillary ponted out the size of his hands and he ignored everything his debate preppers told him to do
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)