I forgot to mention that Bill Rini was involved and aware of the support team's response to me as evident in his post on my thread on 2+2 when he stated "So you know: 2. What your financial resolution is" (post #25). At the time, I had not made a reference to that email yet, and he made it appear in the forum that I had been reimbursed. I hadn't which one can deduce from this statement from that email: "From our investigation and pulling the data from all tournaments you played with the different accounts you reported, you have profited from playing with these accounts and all these accounts suffered losses." (post #36).
Part of my reply to that email was: "I only knew of 3 tournaments I had played with them, and I didn't cash in any of them. It's possible I played in some before I spotted the collusion, so if you would please provide the game #s, game type, buy-in, date and my placement in all of the games, I would appreciate it."
It's been 14 days since I sent that email (and 5 days since I sent a follow-up email) requesting the data, and I haven't received a response...not even the standard "please be assured that your correspondence has been forwarded to the relevant department, and someone will reply to you within the next 72 hours" email. The support team or 888 wouldn't make the decision on their own to not reply to a patron...it had to have been ordered by a WSOP.com supervisor (Bill).
Based on the time that has elapsed since my data request, I'm not confident about the validity of their "you have profited from playing with these accounts" statement. Technically, they could make that statement even if I had won a 1000 player tournament which only one of the cheaters had played. It's irrelevant if I profited as a whole against them since I was defrauded from at least the 3 separate SNGs I was aware of, and I, the accuser, should be reimbursed for them. I'm just curious to see what else I may have played against them, as I know I would have identified their unusual play, obvious collusion, and that they were 4 non-regulars in a 6 person SNG if I had played with them prior to me first suspecting them.
We know that WSOP.com is directly aware of how the support team handles certain matters. We also can assume that the support team was encouraged or perhaps coerced by WSOP.com supervisors (Bill) to give a (perhaps) false and irrelevant statement so as not to reimburse one (me) who had been cheated. WSOP.com is directly involved and WSOP.com and Bill Rini should be held accountable.





Reply With Quote