When we voted Brexit we showed you how stupid it was to stick your hand in the fire.
Voting for trump would be sticking your hand in the fire having first doused your hand in lighter fuel.
When we voted Brexit we showed you how stupid it was to stick your hand in the fire.
Voting for trump would be sticking your hand in the fire having first doused your hand in lighter fuel.
Originally Posted by Tyde
The topics for next week’s third and final presidential debate at UNLV were announced Wednesday by the Commission on Presidential Debates.
Republican nominee Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton will square off on six topics:
Debt and entitlements
Immigration
Economy
Supreme Court
Foreign hot spots
Fitness to be president
Each topic will be alotted roughly 15 minutes during the 90-minute debate, which have no commercial breaks.
The debate will kick off at 6 p.m. Wednesday inside the Thomas and Mack Center.
Will Trump win this time? Does it even mattter?
Donald Trump claims the election is rigged against him and vows to jail Hillary Clinton if he’s elected.
Trump also suggested Saturday that Clinton had been on drugs during the last debate and challenged her to a drug test before the final debate Wednesday.
Since when does single digit leads in polls prior to the election guarantee a victory? And that could go for either Trump or Clinton.
Leave it to Dirty Bizzle to deflect Hillary's criminal tendencies and never acknowledged her criminal behavior. He just continues to post convoluted articles that are liable at best.
We get it, you're a libtard.
"Druff would suck his own dick if it were long enough"- Brandon "drexel" Gerson
"ann coulter literally has more common sense than pfa."-Sonatine
"Real grinders supports poker fraud"- Ray Davis
"DRILLED HER GOOD"- HONGKONGER
If you currently benefit from life in America, you vote the status quo. If you feel like you're getting a "raw deal" despite being the victim of your own relentlessly rube'esque decisions, you vote for the fringe guy, because your life really cant get any worse no matter how badly he tanks the economy, makes us the laughing stock of the civilized world, and/or allows our position in the global food chain to drop behind our economic rivals.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
Maybe Trump has to win to break the chain of corruption and Lying that seems to be the acceptable norm for all politician's. Not just in the USA
he can always be impeached if he does something stupid, can't he?
I highly doubt he would be left alone with the foot ball. plus he probably would know how to open it up with out help.
Hillary would be to busy counting her money's
all hail Hydra
Originally Posted by DanDruff:Since I'm a 6'2" Republican with an average-sized nose and a last name which doesn't end with "stein", "man", or "berg", I can hide among the goyim and remain undetected unless I open my mouth about money matters.
I dont think Trump would be impeached, because I think would spend the next 4 years blaming 'the system' for his own total, black-out ignorance of constitutional law, governance, and economics, as opposed to doing something impeachable.
Last edited by sonatine; 10-15-2016 at 10:48 PM.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
I'm autistic and this thread is too autistic for me
I dont think Trump would be impeached, because I think would spend the next 4 years blaming 'the system' for his own total, black-out ignorance of constitutional law, governance, and economics, as opposed to doing something impeachable.
U kidding me? Trump will be impeached by June and we will go through a long trial where its 50/50 he gets out of it and we will make a giant thread
Actually they don't realize it but their life could get a LOT worse.
If you currently benefit from life in America, you vote the status quo. If you feel like you're getting a "raw deal" despite being the victim of your own relentlessly rube'esque decisions, you vote for the fringe guy, because your life really cant get any worse no matter how badly he tanks the economy, makes us the laughing stock of the civilized world, and/or allows our position in the global food chain to drop behind our economic rivals.
And replace it with his own chain of corruption and lying?
That thread will make this thread look like Joe Sebok's penis.
U kidding me? Trump will be impeached by June and we will go through a long trial where its 50/50 he gets out of it and we will make a giant thread
first off i think shes a financial conservative, and i think this country needs to take a conservative line for the immediate future in terms of its spending/social programs, but do so without compromising first world liberties like abortion/PP.
second off, shes game as fuck when it comes to foreign policy. she knows what can and cannot be accomplished behind the curtains, and her rolodex is probably best in slot.
third off, shes been operating well above partisan circle jerking for years and that means shes going to be in a weird and potentially wonderful position to make equity considerations without getting into tit for tat House of Cards style negotiations that are intrinsically biased for/against parties.
lastly, i trust her judgement on getting moderate/progressive supreme court choices seated who arent going to try to 'reset the clock' back to those halcyon days of backroom abortions, bloody oppression, and trickle down honkey bullshit.
so as a political animal i have confidence in her to apply austerity measures in meaningful, appropriate, measured ways without risking a civil war. that goes a long way for me here.
bitch reminds me of thatcher a little.
Post contains 4 reasons, but was posted twice, making 8. The double post was a clue to have two 8s, I.e for Column 88. Absolute proof of being a neo-nazi.first off i think shes a financial conservative, and i think this country needs to take a conservative line for the immediate future in terms of its spending/social programs, but do so without compromising first world liberties like abortion/PP.
second off, shes game as fuck when it comes to foreign policy. she knows what can and cannot be accomplished behind the curtains, and her rolodex is probably best in slot.
third off, shes been operating well above partisan circle jerking for years and that means shes going to be in a weird and potentially wonderful position to make equity considerations without getting into tit for tat House of Cards style negotiations that are intrinsically biased for/against parties.
lastly, i trust her judgement on getting moderate/progressive supreme court choices seated who arent going to try to 'reset the clock' back to those halcyon days of backroom abortions, bloody oppression, and trickle down honkey bullshit.
so as a political animal i have confidence in her to apply austerity measures in meaningful, appropriate, measured ways without risking a civil war. that goes a long way for me here.
bitch reminds me of thatcher a little.
You never, ever vote for a Democrat if you want a financial conservative.
Just because she sold her soul to Wall Street to make $200,000 "speeches" doesn't mean she's a financial conservative. She just needs to take care of those who took care of her, which is even worse than a financial liberal who at least is going to attempt their version of fairness.
In fact, Hillary has already proposed the usual leftist "soak the rich" tax increases, in order to pacify the Bernie bots into believing she's progressive.
Therein lies a lot of the problem. Even if Hillary believes in more conservative financial principles deep down (which I don't believe anyway), opportunistic political Hillary is going to take over and do the opposite. She has to pacify the Bernie bots to think that she's respecting their progressive values (and thus representing them), so they get off her case and stop causing dissent within her own party. She's already planning upon attempting to have a unified Democratic Party by the time she runs again in 2020, so she can devote all of her energy to beating her next Republican challenger -- one who likely won't be an easy target like Trump.
I keep hearing things like this, but I've seen no evidence of it, especially from her time as Secretary of State.
This is the person who stated that the Benghazi attack was the result of a YouTube video. (Duck! I said "Benghazi"! Liberal outrage about to commence!)
Knowing how foreign policy works doesn't make you good at foreign policy, much like being a dealer in poker doesn't make you a good player.
Are you kidding me? Aside from her time in the Senate, she was never really in a position where she had to do any kind of bipartisan negotiation. And as Chris Christie famously said to Marco Rubio, being in the Senate isn't really a decision-making position.
It's not like she was a governor where she got both sides of the aisle to agree, allowing bipartisan laws to be passed. Hillary has no such experience uniting the two parties.
Ah... the old "repeal Roe v. Wade" scare tactic from the left.
Tell me... how come this didn't happen when the conservatives had a majority for so long?
Bloody oppression via the Supreme Court? Trickle down economics via the Supreme Court? Huh?
No, instead I'm looking forward to a liberal Supreme Court, so we can return to the days of 40 years ago where violent criminals are coddled and "rehabilitation" for society's monsters is stressed over punishment and getting them out of society.
You aren't from this country, but I remember those glory days of the '70s and '80s when serial child molesters were paroled after 5 years, armed-robbery murderers were paroled after 8, and life without the possibility of parole was ruled "cruel and unusual punishment".
I can't wait to see the new generation of liberals putting all kinds of new restrictions on police, returning to the days of "rehabilitating" the worst of the worst, and enabling so many digital "privacy" rights that we are unable to collect evidence to convict serious criminals who put forth even a modicum of effort to hide things properly. And you know... this will all take place while private industry collects so much data on us that they can literally tell us when we will take our next dump, yet somehow none of that will bother anyone, because it's not the government doing it.
I look forward to this brave new world.
Buckle up.
seriously hitlermantium get your libtarded shit together.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
Dont shoot the messenger, the dude that wrote this stuff just asked me to post it because he has a real bad modem + hes busy djing up in Nova ScotiaYou never, ever vote for a Democrat if you want a financial conservative.
Just because she sold her soul to Wall Street to make $200,000 "speeches" doesn't mean she's a financial conservative. She just needs to take care of those who took care of her, which is even worse than a financial liberal who at least is going to attempt their version of fairness.
In fact, Hillary has already proposed the usual leftist "soak the rich" tax increases, in order to pacify the Bernie bots into believing she's progressive.
Therein lies a lot of the problem. Even if Hillary believes in more conservative financial principles deep down (which I don't believe anyway), opportunistic political Hillary is going to take over and do the opposite. She has to pacify the Bernie bots to think that she's respecting their progressive values (and thus representing them), so they get off her case and stop causing dissent within her own party. She's already planning upon attempting to have a unified Democratic Party by the time she runs again in 2020, so she can devote all of her energy to beating her next Republican challenger -- one who likely won't be an easy target like Trump.
I keep hearing things like this, but I've seen no evidence of it, especially from her time as Secretary of State.
This is the person who stated that the Benghazi attack was the result of a YouTube video. (Duck! I said "Benghazi"! Liberal outrage about to commence!)
Knowing how foreign policy works doesn't make you good at foreign policy, much like being a dealer in poker doesn't make you a good player.
Are you kidding me? Aside from her time in the Senate, she was never really in a position where she had to do any kind of bipartisan negotiation. And as Chris Christie famously said to Marco Rubio, being in the Senate isn't really a decision-making position.
It's not like she was a governor where she got both sides of the aisle to agree, allowing bipartisan laws to be passed. Hillary has no such experience uniting the two parties.
Ah... the old "repeal Roe v. Wade" scare tactic from the left.
Tell me... how come this didn't happen when the conservatives had a majority for so long?
Bloody oppression via the Supreme Court? Trickle down economics via the Supreme Court? Huh?
No, instead I'm looking forward to a liberal Supreme Court, so we can return to the days of 40 years ago where violent criminals are coddled and "rehabilitation" for society's monsters is stressed over punishment and getting them out of society.
You aren't from this country, but I remember those glory days of the '70s and '80s when serial child molesters were paroled after 5 years, armed-robbery murderers were paroled after 8, and life without the possibility of parole was ruled "cruel and unusual punishment".
I can't wait to see the new generation of liberals putting all kinds of new restrictions on police, returning to the days of "rehabilitating" the worst of the worst, and enabling so many digital "privacy" rights that we are unable to collect evidence to convict serious criminals who put forth even a modicum of effort to hide things properly. And you know... this will all take place while private industry collects so much data on us that they can literally tell us when we will take our next dump, yet somehow none of that will bother anyone, because it's not the government doing it.
I look forward to this brave new world.
Buckle up.
Drudge claiming something like a Hillary sex scandal is about to drop.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
That will be entertaining.
I hope it's a lesbian one.
Not because I want to picture Hillary munching carpet, unless I just drank poison and needed to induce vomiting, but because it will just be hilarious.
But that's all it will be -- entertaining.
I mean, we had a Bill Clinton sex scandal during the 1992 election -- one he admitted to -- and it didn't come close to stopping him.
If Hillary was cheating on Bill, is anyone going to care? Or are people just going to (accurately) retort, "Yeah, we knew that marriage was a sham 25 years ago. What's your point?"
I mean, if their marriage was depicted as picture-perfect and loving, that would be one thing, but I think even Hillary's biggest supporters will concede that these two have stayed together primarily for political reasons.
Also, if there is a sex scandal, I pray that it's something real, and not just some fringe rumor bullshit cooked up to counter the Trump grab-em-by-the-pussy tape.
Anyway, barring some massive, earthshattering revelation about Hillary, Trump's goose is cooked in this election.
That will be entertaining.
I hope it's a lesbian one.
Not because I want to picture Hillary munching carpet, unless I just drank poison and needed to induce vomiting, but because it will just be hilarious.
But that's all it will be -- entertaining.
I mean, we had a Bill Clinton sex scandal during the 1992 election -- one he admitted to -- and it didn't come close to stopping him.
If Hillary was cheating on Bill, is anyone going to care? Or are people just going to (accurately) retort, "Yeah, we knew that marriage was a sham 25 years ago. What's your point?"
I mean, if their marriage was depicted as picture-perfect and loving, that would be one thing, but I think even Hillary's biggest supporters will concede that these two have stayed together primarily for political reasons.
Also, if there is a sex scandal, I pray that it's something real, and not just some fringe rumor bullshit cooked up to counter the Trump grab-em-by-the-pussy tape.
Anyway, barring some massive, earthshattering revelation about Hillary, Trump's goose is cooked in this election.
His tweet was posted with a pic of her chilling on the Ellen show. Draw your own Sapphic conclusions.
"Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness." - Alejandro Jodorowsky
"America is not so much a nightmare as a non-dream. The American non-dream is precisely a move to wipe the dream out of existence. The dream is a spontaneous happening and therefore dangerous to a control system set up by the non-dreamers." -- William S. Burroughs
There are currently 11 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 11 guests)
Reply With Quote
